site stats

Pucl v. union of india

WebIn People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs. Union of India (UOI) and Anr. (18.12.1996 – SC) the honourable judge of the Supreme Court Mr. Kuldip Singh stated that “With the growth of highly sophisticated communication technology, the right to hold telephone conversation, in the privacy of one’s home or office without interference, is increasingly susceptible to … WebIndia India Threats against Mr K G Kannabiran and his. A to School of Management Sciences Lucknow. ... May 21st, 2024 - Peoples s Union for Civil Liberties PUCL is an non partisan and non political organisation free from political ideologies allowing people from different p Free Download Here pdfsdocuments2 com

Judgment of the Supreme Court on NOTA - GS SCORE

WebIn Hukam Chand Shyam Lal v. Union of India,4 the SC interpreted Section 5 of the Telegraph Act. The same interpretation was followed in PUCL v. Union of India.5The court. 4 Hukam Chand Shyam Lal v. Union of India, (1976) AIR 789. 5 PUCL v. Union of India, (2002) 3 … WebPUCL v Union of India Page 1 of 14 18/12/1996 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No. 246 of 1991 Petitioner Versus The Union of India and Respondent People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) Another Date of Judgment 18/12/1996 Coram Kuldip Singh and S. Saghir Ahmad, JJ 1996(9) Scale microsoft office full crack tinhte https://easykdesigns.com

Right To Food: an element of Right to Life - legalserviceindia.com

WebProducts and services. Our innovative products and services for learners, authors and customers are based on world-class research and are relevant, exciting and inspiring. WebDec 8, 2014 · B. The Ambit of PUCL v. UOI. Although the case of PUCL was initially brought against the Government of India, Food Corporation of India and 6 State Governments … WebJul 12, 2024 · PUCL v. UOI [AIR 2003 SC 2363] The Supreme Court reiterated its position, holding that voters have a right to obtain information regarding political candidates as per the provisions of Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Bench - K.G. Balakrishnan, P.Venkatarama Reddi. Facts - The People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) questioned the … microsoft office full kurulum

People

Category:PUCL v. Union of India & anr. (NOTA CASE ) 2013- Our Legal World

Tags:Pucl v. union of india

Pucl v. union of india

PUCL v. Union of India & anr. (NOTA CASE ) 2013- Our Legal World

WebDec 6, 2024 · The Court was dealing with pleas filed by the People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) questioning the correctness of over 90 encounter killings by the Mumbai Police between 1995 and 1997. Last year, the NGO had also approached the Supreme Court raising concern about the rate of encounter killings in Uttar Pradesh. WebApr 14, 2024 · In light of the above discussion and having regard to the directions issued by the Bombay High Court, guidelines issued by NHRC, suggestions of the appellant – PUCL, amicus curiae and the affidavits filed by the Union of India, State Governments and the Union Territories, we think it appropriate to issue the following requirements to be ...

Pucl v. union of india

Did you know?

WebThe first respondent, Union of India, ... PUCL v. UoI, (1997) 3 SCC 433; Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, (1997) 6 SCC 241. Having noted the above we would with respect like to point … WebPeople's Union For Civil Liberties (PUCL) And Another, V. Union Of India And Another, 2002(005) SCC 0361SC 3. ... Dinesh Trivedi, M.P. And Others V. Union Of India And Others, 1997(004) SCC 0306SC 5. Tata Press Ltd., V. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited And Others, 1995(005) SCC 0139 SC 6. Secretary, Ministry Of Information & Broadcasting, Govt.

The Supreme Court of India held that Indian voters have a right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution to obtain information about political candidates. The People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) challenged the validity of a 1951 law, which stated that political candidates were not bound to disclose any … See more The People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) challenged the validity of Section 33B of the Representation of People Act, 1951. Section 33B provided that, … See more P. Venkatarma Reddi, J., delivered the opinion of the Court. The Supreme Court of India reiterated that Article 19(1)(a) includes the right of voters to have basic … See more WebDec 18, 1996 · People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India & Anr. [(1997) 1 SCC 301]. Incidents of telephone tapping were challenged as being violative of Art. 19(1)(a) and 21 of the Constitution. While recognizing individual’s right to privacy, the Court laid down guidelines to be followed by the State in all cases of telephone tapping.

WebMar 20, 2024 · The case—People’s Union for Civil Liberties v Union of India (popularly known as the Right to Food case)—sought to transform the government’s policy choices on food into enforceable rights ... WebApr 16, 2024 · The People’s Union of Civil Liberties, a non-profit organization, has filed a public interest appeal under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, highlighting recent occurrences of telephone tapping. The petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 5 (2) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (the Act), arguing that it should ...

WebNov 2, 2024 · PUCL Statement on Threat to Judicial Independence - "We the People" of India need to stand up and assert Constitutional Values and Ethos. January 17, 2024. Issue: …

WebFeb 18, 2024 · Facts of the case: The facts of the case are that Petitioner – Kuldip Nayar has filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the Indian Constitution, which basically sought to challenge the amendments that were made to the Representation of People act, 1951 (hereby referred to as the act of 1951) in the year 2003 which is amendment 40 of 2003 ... microsoft office fußnote einfügenWebJun 24, 2024 · PUCL & Anr v/s. Union of India. Kirti Garg ; June 24, 2024 Content : The case Union for Civil Liberties and another v. Union of India and another with Lok Satta and … microsoft office full 2023WebApr 8, 2024 · How this is done is provided for in Rule 419A of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951. Rule 419A was added to the Telegraph Rules after the Supreme Court verdict in PUCL v. Union of India AIR 1997 SC 568. how to create a folded booklet in powerpointWebIndia. Law(s) Article 14, Article 21. Bench Strength. 3 Judges. Case Type/Origin. Civil Appeal. Case Status. Overruled. Number of Opinion(s) 1. Case Citation. AIR 2008 SC 582, (2008) 1 … how to create a folder and subfolderWebApr 20, 2004 · Supreme Court hearings on the right to food (PUCL vs Union of India and others, Civil Writ Petition 196 of 2001) have been held at regular intervals since April 2001. Though the judgement is still awaited, interim orders have been passed from time to time. This order is primarily on the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS). microsoft office funktioniert nichtWebApr 10, 2024 · “The justice delivery system is taking its own sweet time against an IPS officer accused of several instances of brutal custodial torture, despite multiple Supreme … how to create a folded card in wordWebAggrieved by this decision, the Union of India had went in appeal to the Supreme Court wherein it was submitted that till suitable amendments were made in the Representation … how to create a folder for selected photos